Compound Monograph

Enterolactone

Phenolics Lignans Endogenous metabolite (produced by gut microbiota from dietary plant lignans)

Enterolactone is the principal mammalian lignan — a metabolite produced by gut bacteria from dietary plant lignans (matairesinol, secoisolariciresinol and others), not a plant constituent itself. It is the main serum/urinary biomarker of lignan and whole-grain/fiber intake, which is why almost all "lignan phytoestrogen" epidemiology actually measures enterolactone. The human evidence is observational, biomarker-based and directionally mixed; there are no isolate trials.

Sources · 5

Where Does It Come From?

Enterolactone is a produced in the body mammalian lignan (enterolignan; gut-microbial metabolite), found in Not a plant constituent — produced by gut bacteria from dietary plant lignans and 4 other sources. It is well tolerated orally (low toxicity).

Also found in
Flaxseed lignans — principal dietary precursor Monograph coming soon
Lariciresinol and pinoresinol Monograph coming soon
Matairesinol — direct precursor Monograph coming soon
Measured as serum/urinary enterolactone, the lignan/fiber biomarker Monograph coming soon
Not a plant constituent — produced by gut bacteria from dietary plant lignans Monograph coming soon

Concentration

Content by Source

Concentrations not reported. No percent-dry-weight or mg/g figures have been published for this compound in its source plants.

Enterolactone at a Glance

Enterolactone is the principal mammalian lignan, produced by gut bacteria from dietary plant lignans rather than eaten directly.

Its main scientific role is as a biomarker: serum and urinary enterolactone is the standard measure of dietary lignan exposure in epidemiology, and much of what is known about lignans and hormone-related cancer risk is built on it.

That makes it a compound studied largely as a measurement rather than as an intervention — and it is why its levels reflect both what someone eats and which bacteria they carry.

What It's Used For

Enterolactone is the principal mammalian lignan — and the honest hinge of the whole page is that it is not a plant constituent. It is produced in the colon by gut bacteria from dietary plant lignans (matairesinol, secoisolariciresinol, lariciresinol and others, via enterodiol), and it is the molecule that “lignan/phytoestrogen” epidemiology actually measures: serum/urinary enterolactone is the validated biomarker of lignan and whole-grain/fiber intake. That makes two caveats load-bearing everywhere below — confounding (high enterolactone marks a plant-rich, high-fiber diet) and microbiome-dependence (antibiotics abolish its production). All human evidence is observational; there are no isolate trials.

A validated dietary biomarkerof lignan/fiber intake, with associational links to breast-cancer prognosis and cardiovascular mortality — directionally mixed and menopausal-status-dependent 4,7,10Reference 4Buck K et al. · 2010Meta-analysisMeta-analyses of lignans and enterolignans in relation to breast-cancer riskView study →Reference 7Liu Z et al. · 2021Meta-analysisLignan intake and enterolactone concentration and prognosis of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysisView study →Reference 10Vanharanta M et al. · 2003Risk of cardiovascular-disease-related and all-cause death according to serum enterolactone: Kuopio Ischaemic Heart Disease Risk Factor StudyView study →.
The honest headline:every human finding is a biomarker association, not causation — high enterolactone co-tracks a healthy, plant-rich diet, and it cannot be meaningfully “dosed” because it is made by your microbiome 5,9Reference 5Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A et al. · 2004Circulating enterolactone and risk of breast cancer: a prospective study in New YorkView study →Reference 9Vanharanta M et al. · 1999ObservationalRisk of acute coronary events according to serum enterolactone: a prospective population-based case-control studyView study →.
Evidence by IndicationStrength of support · Beta

Support is an experimental score — weighted by study type (human > animal > in vitro) and volume. A beta, not a validated metric. All human data are observational/biomarker-based, so scores reflect association strength, not proof.

Mechanisms

Target / pathwayEffectRelevant to
Gut microbiota (dehydroxylation/demethylation of plant lignans)plant lignans → enterodiol → enterolactone
why it is a metabolite/biomarker; antibiotic abolition; huge inter-individual variability
ERα / ERβweak SERM-like binding (concentration-dependent)
phytoestrogen framing; hormone-cancer epidemiology
Aromatase (CYP19) / 17β-HSDweak modeled modulation of estrogen biosynthesis
hormone-cancer mechanistic hypothesis
SHBGproposed increase → lower free sex-hormone bioavailability
indirect hormone-cancer link (limited human data)
Radical scavenging; NF-κBantioxidant; suppression in models (mostly parent lignans)
preclinical CVD/anti-inflammatory hypothesis

Pharmacokinetics

Enterolactone is not ingested — it is produced in the colon by gut bacteria from dietary plant lignans (matairesinol, secoisolariciresinol, lariciresinol, pinoresinol; the plant lignans → enterodiol → enterolactone) 1,2Reference 1Heinonen S et al. · 2001In-vitro metabolism of plant lignans: new precursors of the mammalian lignans enterolactone and enterodiolView study →Reference 2Wang LQ · 2002Mammalian phytoestrogens: enterodiol and enterolactoneView study →. The enterolignans are then absorbed, undergo enterohepatic recirculation, are glucuronidated (and sulfated) in the liver, and are excreted in urine, with a plasma half-life on the order of ~12–24 h, so serum/urinary enterolactone reflects habitual rather than acute intake 2Reference 2Wang LQ · 2002Mammalian phytoestrogens: enterodiol and enterolactoneView study →. The defining feature is enormous inter-individual variability driven by the microbiome: conversion efficiency depends on gut-flora composition, and broad-spectrum antibiotics sharply reduce or abolish production for weeks 3Reference 3Baldi S et al. · 2023Interplay between lignans and gut microbiota: nutritional, functional and methodological aspectsView study →. The same lignan intake yields very different enterolactone exposure between individuals — central to interpreting every association here.

Clinical trials

There are no interventional trials of isolated enterolactone in humans — by definition it is generated endogenously from dietary lignans by the microbiome, not administered as a drug. All human evidence is observational: prospective cohorts and nested case-control studies using serum/urinary enterolactone as a biomarker 4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12Reference 4Buck K et al. · 2010Meta-analysisMeta-analyses of lignans and enterolignans in relation to breast-cancer riskView study →Reference 5Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A et al. · 2004Circulating enterolactone and risk of breast cancer: a prospective study in New YorkView study →Reference 6Seibold P et al. · 2014Meta-analysisEnterolactone concentrations and prognosis after postmenopausal breast cancer: effect modification and meta-analysisView study →Reference 7Liu Z et al. · 2021Meta-analysisLignan intake and enterolactone concentration and prognosis of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysisView study →Reference 8Micek A et al. · 2021Meta-analysisDietary phytoestrogens and biomarkers of their intake in relation to cancer survival and recurrence: a systematic review with meta-analysisView study →Reference 9Vanharanta M et al. · 1999ObservationalRisk of acute coronary events according to serum enterolactone: a prospective population-based case-control studyView study →Reference 10Vanharanta M et al. · 2003Risk of cardiovascular-disease-related and all-cause death according to serum enterolactone: Kuopio Ischaemic Heart Disease Risk Factor StudyView study →Reference 11Eriksen AK et al. · 2019ObservationalPre-diagnostic plasma enterolactone and lower mortality among individuals with type 2 diabetes: Danish Diet, Cancer and Health cohortView study →Reference 12Stattin P et al. · 2002ObservationalCirculating enterolactone and prostate-cancer risk: a Nordic nested case-control studyView study →, plus flaxseed/lignan feeding studies that raise enterolactone and measure intermediate endpoints rather than clinical outcomes 15Reference 15Bowers LW et al. · 2019The flaxseed lignan secoisolariciresinol diglucoside decreases local inflammation, suppresses NF-κB signalling and inhibits mammary tumour growthView study →. The entire clinical evidence base is associational, not causal.

CompletedPlannedTerminatedObservational (biomarker)
—(no isolate trial)——Extensive

Last checked: July 2026.

Toxicity & Safety

Enterolactone is not something you take — anyone eating a plant-rich diet produces it continuously, and there is no toxicity signal at those exposures. The only caution is precautionary and hormonal, and it applies to concentrated lignan supplements.

Safety at a Glance
Low / no toxicity
  • An endogenous metabolite of a normal diet. Continuously produced by anyone with lignan intake and an intact microbiome, with no toxicity signal at dietary exposures.
  • Avoid concentrated lignan supplements in pregnancy and lactation. Precautionary hormonal grounds.
  • Caution in hormone-sensitive conditions. Weak SERM-like ER activity means supplemental use warrants care with ER-positive breast cancer or endometrial disease.
  • A premenopausal-prognosis signal exists. One meta-analysis is reason not to over-encourage high-dose lignan supplementation.
  • Antibiotics blunt formation. They markedly reduce enterolactone production, blunting any expected benefit.
Full Safety & Interactions Detail

Enterolactone is effectively an endogenous metabolite of a normal plant-rich diet — anyone with lignan intake and an intact microbiome produces it continuously, and there is no toxicity signal at dietary exposures (and no isolate to dose). The only caution is theoretical and phytoestrogenic: because enterolactone has weak SERM-like ER activity, concentrated/supplemental phytoestrogen use warrants caution in hormone-sensitive conditions (ER-positive breast cancer, endometrial disease), and the premenopausal-prognosis signal in one meta-analysis 7Reference 7Liu Z et al. · 2021Meta-analysisLignan intake and enterolactone concentration and prognosis of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysisView study → is a reason not to over-encourage high-dose lignan supplementation. This is precautionary, not evidence of harm at food intakes. Note a microbiome interaction rather than a toxicity: antibiotics markedly reduce enterolactone formation, blunting any expected benefit.

Dosage

No therapeutic dose exists and none is recommended. Enterolactone cannot be meaningfully “dosed” — it is produced by the individual’s gut flora from dietary lignans at a microbiome-set rate. The relevant exposure is dietary lignan intake (flaxseed is by far the richest common source; sesame, whole grains/rye, other seeds, legumes and vegetables also contribute), and serum enterolactone is used as a research biomarker, not a target to titrate.

References

  1. Heinonen S, et al. (2001). In-vitro metabolism of plant lignans: new precursors of the mammalian lignans enterolactone and enterodiol. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11453749/
  2. Wang LQ (2002). Mammalian phytoestrogens: enterodiol and enterolactone. Journal of Chromatography B. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12270221/
  3. Baldi S, Tristán Asensi M, Pallecchi M, et al. (2023). Interplay between lignans and gut microbiota: nutritional, functional and methodological aspects. Molecules. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36615537/
  4. Buck K, et al. (2010). Meta-analyses of lignans and enterolignans in relation to breast-cancer risk. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20463043/
  5. Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A, et al. (2004). Circulating enterolactone and risk of breast cancer: a prospective study in New York. British Journal of Cancer. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15226762/
  6. Seibold P, et al. (2014). Enterolactone concentrations and prognosis after postmenopausal breast cancer: effect modification and meta-analysis. International Journal of Cancer. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24436155/
  7. Liu Z, et al. (2021). Lignan intake and enterolactone concentration and prognosis of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Cancer. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33854638/
  8. Micek A, et al. (2021). Dietary phytoestrogens and biomarkers of their intake in relation to cancer survival and recurrence: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Nutrition Reviews. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32632445/
  9. Vanharanta M, et al. (1999). Risk of acute coronary events according to serum enterolactone: a prospective population-based case-control study. Lancet. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10609816/
  10. Vanharanta M, et al. (2003). Risk of cardiovascular-disease-related and all-cause death according to serum enterolactone: Kuopio Ischaemic Heart Disease Risk Factor Study. Archives of Internal Medicine. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12742810/
  11. Eriksen AK, et al. (2019). Pre-diagnostic plasma enterolactone and lower mortality among individuals with type 2 diabetes: Danish Diet, Cancer and Health cohort. Diabetologia. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30963187/
  12. Stattin P, et al. (2002). Circulating enterolactone and prostate-cancer risk: a Nordic nested case-control study. International Journal of Cancer. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11948503/
  13. Cosentino M, et al. (2007). Estrogenic activity of 7-hydroxymatairesinol potassium acetate and of its active metabolite enterolactone in MCF-7 cells. Pharmacological Research. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17572100/
  14. Karkola S, Wähälä K (2009). The binding of lignans, flavonoids and coumestrol to CYP450 aromatase: a molecular-modelling study. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19000737/
  15. Bowers LW, et al. (2019). The flaxseed lignan secoisolariciresinol diglucoside decreases local inflammation, suppresses NF-κB signalling and inhibits mammary tumour growth. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30367332/